Donate Shop Register


Gatekeepers or Gate Crashers?
Gatekeepers or Gate Crashers?



By David Suissa
The Jewish Journal
January 30, 2013



How can a dubious and unoriginal Israeli movie become the darling of the film world and even get nominated for an Academy Award?

That is the real story behind “The Gatekeepers,” a documentary that, as Jodi Rudoren of The New York Times writes, “has already captured the attention of the world: at least 10 American film critics, including two from The New York Times, put it in their best-of-2012 lists.”

The film, as Rudoren describes it, “braids the recollections and reflections of six former chiefs of the Shin Bet, Israel’s internal security service, into a disturbing narrative of their country’s occupation of the Palestinian territories since 1967.”

I saw the film last Sunday at a screening in Beverly Hills, after which I moderated a panel discussion. Basically, the film is an artful pastiche of former security gurus telling us how war sucks, occupation sucks, making peace is really important, if only the politicians would listen to us, and other such “revelations.”

The filmmaker himself, Dror Moreh, admitted in a Times interview that “the power [of the film] is not so much the message as the messengers.”

That, in fact, is the movie’s main claim to fame — that “for the first time ever,” as the press materials exclaim, these tough guys “share their insights and reflect publicly on their actions and decisions.”

That “first-time ever” claim comes up on a title card at the beginning of the film, setting up a frisson of drama that lasts throughout the film, as you think, “Oh my God, these mystery guys are finally talking!”

The problem is that it’s not true.

As Rudoren reveals in her Times story, four of these security chiefs had already broken their agency’s code of silence in 2003 in a high-profile press interview, and the others have spoken out since.

Why is this important?

Because what “The Gatekeepers” preaches — that Israel’s policymakers should heed the advice and criticism of their security chiefs regarding the occupation — was already tried years ago, which you’d never know from seeing this film.

The 2003 interview was published in Israel’s major daily, Yedioth Ahronoth, and featured all four former Shin Bet chiefs at the time. As my friend Rick Richman notes on PJ Media, The Washington Post subsequently reported the interview on its front page, under the headline “Ex-Security Chiefs Turn on Sharon,” beginning the story as follows:

“Four former chiefs of Israel’s powerful domestic security service said in an interview published Friday [Nov. 14, 2003] that the government’s actions and policies during the three-year-old Palestinian uprising have gravely damaged the country and its people.

“The four, who variously headed the Shin Bet security agency from 1980 to 2000 under governments that spanned the political spectrum, said that Israel must end its occupation of the West Bank and Gaza Strip …”

It turns out their complaints had a major influence on Israeli policy. As Rudoren reports, the criticism in the 2003 article was “critical in persuading Mr. Sharon, once called the father of the settlements, to evacuate those in the Gaza Strip.”

Now imagine that as a premise for a documentary: Security hawks speak up, policymakers listen up, a heart-wrenching evacuation of 8,000 Jews ensues, terrorist rockets are launched from the evacuated areas, and a nation is left bewildered as to what to do next.

What would you call that film? “The Gate Crashers”?

The problem, of course, is that such a film would be too complicated. It would impose too much nuance on the simplified narrative of “The Gatekeepers” that evidently so appeals to film critics.

That other film would have to include, for example, the fact that after Israel took over the West Bank and Gaza in 1967, living conditions for the Palestinians improved significantly, from education to health care to their standard of living.

That film would have to mention that Israel has offered to end the occupation three times, and that the Palestinians walked away each time.

It would also have to include, as Amoz Oz said in a Times interview this week, the fact that most Israelis would wave goodbye to the West Bank, but “they don’t want the Gaza scenario to repeat itself.”

None of these complications ever made it into “The Gatekeepers.”

The filmmaker, Moreh, in published interviews and press materials, does not pretend that the 2003 interviews don’t exist. He admits that the security chiefs influenced Sharon’s decision to disengage from Gaza, but he says he thinks it’s time for these chiefs to “address the people at large and not just the inner circles of decision-makers,” and he wants his film to “initiate that dialogue.”

As if that public dialogue hasn’t been going on for years!

That’s what makes the film so sneaky and manipulative. By using the so-called “revelations” of Israeli tough guys discussing the world’s most famous cause —ending the Israeli occupation — the film creates the illusion of being fresh and “important.”

In truth, it’s only important in one sense: It reminds us that if you want to make a popular film today about the Israeli-Palestinian conflict, just make sure you follow the popular notions about the conflict, and never, ever dare to challenge the conventional wisdom.

That would only be crashing the Oscar party.

David Suissa is president of TRIBE Media Corp./Jewish Journal and can be reached at davids@jewishjournal.com.



Read Article Here
Other stories
2/23/2017
Jesse Stock of StandWithUs is interviewed on TV...
2/23/2017
A member of a leading Israel advocacy group told The Algemeiner that a new educational tra...
2/23/2017
A Jewish engineer in Georgia who rented his driveway to a film crew including Danny Glover...
2/23/2017
The Irish government is debating a decision to approve a one-sided recognition of a Palest...
2/21/2017
Undergraduate Adam Rozen-Wheeler along with several other students were looking forward to...
2/21/2017
A Hollywood actor`s BDS activism is producing a donation to a nonprofit organization battl...
2/20/2017
AUSTIN - A key step was taken last week to help make sure House Bill 89 or Senate Bill 134...
2/17/2017
On February 5, 2017 the Times of Israel published a piece discussing an upcoming “St...
2/16/2017
StandWithUs condemns Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP) for hosting Rasmeah Odeh as a keynote sp...
2/16/2017
WASHINGTON—American Jewish leaders are enthusiastically applauding President Do...
2/14/2017
Jewish singer/songwriter Melissa Manchester felt inspired in releasing her new Hanukkah so...
2/13/2017
Stand With Israel" Day Brings SWU and Student Activists to Austin, Texas January 9, 2017 ...
2/13/2017
State governments across the US have taken a more aggressive stance against the anti-Israe...
2/10/2017
Some college students look for causes to take a position on. They wear them as symbols of ...
2/9/2017
Two women of faith from opposite corners of the world are on a mission to spread goodwill,...
2/9/2017
Hussein Aboubakr Mansour`s harrowing journey from oppression to freedom...
2/8/2017
A group of 60 young people concluded a full-day of training preparing them to argue for th...
2/6/2017
Israeli-Arab Yahya Mahamed shares his personal journey to Israel Activism at Limmud Helsin...
2/6/2017
Exactly 15 years ago, on February 1st 2002, Daniel Pearl, a journalist for the Wall Street...
2/6/2017
January 17, 2016. Dafna Meir, of blessed memory, a nurse and a mother of 6, was brutally m...

 

About Us
Get Involved
Resources
Shop For Israel
Social Media
StandWithUs Websites