Criminal complaints are now being filed by students following the belligerent disruption of a May 17, 2018 Students Supporting Israel (SSI) event at the University of California Los Angeles. At least a half-dozen students announced they would visit the UCLA police department to file formal complaints of criminal disruption of a meeting, as well as disturbing the peace and conspiracy.
The move follows media disclosures that UCLA was reneging on a public pledge by two chancellors in The Daily Bruin — bolstered by a statement for the record by a university spokesman — to refer the May 17 incident to prosecutors.
The disruption and nose-to-nose intimidation of the students attending the May 17 SSI event at UCLA was documented in a video, beginning at minute 41. Disruptors suddenly and loudly stormed into the room mid-session. One person tore down a flag, demonstratively pulled away a desk placard, and cursed threateningly close to the face of a panelist. With bullhorns, whistles, staged dancing, and slogans shouted, the event was shut down.
The Louis D. Brandeis Center, led by attorney Alyza Lewin along with Director of Legal Initiatives Aviva Vogelstein and three law students in the UCLA Brandeis chapter, dispatched a letter to the university asserting that the disruption crossed the line into misdemeanor violations of the California criminal code. They cited Title 11, section 403, which covers deliberate disruption of a public meeting — successfully used to convict the so-called Irvine 11; section 415, which covers malicious disturbance of the peace; and section 182, which forbids any conspiracy to violate the other sections.
At the same time, two UCLA chancellors, Jerry Kang and Monroe Gorden, penned an official denunciation of the incident that was published in The Daily Bruin campus newspaper. Their statement promised, “For those outsiders who disrupted the event, we will refer all evidence of wrongdoing to local prosecutors to determine whether they have broken the law.”
Bolstering the chancellors, university spokesman Tad Tamberg confirmed, “The off-campus people who have been identified … have been arrested previously and are known to the police here and have been referred to the prosecutor’s office.” He added that a proper police investigation had already been completed. “You don’t send something to the prosecutor’s office without first investigating it,” he stated. The involved UCLA students were to be referred to university discipline rather than prosecutors, the university stated.
It was not clear why UCLA students who potentially broke the law would not receive the same referral to prosecutors as outsiders for the same conduct.
The case then took a strange and unexplained twist. In an email three weeks after the event, Tamberg clarified, “There were no arrests, nor did anyone file a police report or complaint regarding the May 17 disruption, hence there was no police investigation.” Tamberg explained his prior assurance about a referral to prosecutors actually involved in the disruption of an earlier, completely unrelated February 26, 2018 event with Treasury Secretary Steve Mnuchin.
Prosecutors and police assert that without the filing of actual police complaints, no investigation or referral to the prosecutor can take place. None of the involved students contacted said they had filed a report, with two saying they did not even know they had the right to file such a complaint. Hence, no action could be taken.
After the media disclosure, numerous students stepped forward to file complaints. The first was Justin Feldman, president of the SSI chapter at Santa Monica College. Feldman stated he feared for his personal safety during the incident. On June 11, Feldman, who had previously completed a StandWithUs (SWU) high school training program, appeared at the UCLA police department accompanied by SWU legal director Yael Lerman to formally file his complaint.
More than a few of the students harassed during the May 17 event were nervous about filing a police report. But according to Lerman, the police made the whole process “comfortable,” acting “helpful and respectful.” After a short wait at the station, officers Robert Chavez and Lowell Rose escorted Feldman into a small room where his report was taken during an hour-long interview in what Lerman described as an “unrushed” session.
Lerman credited Feldman for his actions. “What Justin did in filing was critical in moving the process forward. The [UCLA] administration has known about this for weeks and has chosen not to move this forward. So now the students have to.”
After emerging from the police station, Feldman stated, “I feel empowered.” He added, “I feel it is so important for students to take matters into our own hands and not leave them to bureaucratic measures.” He said that “most students simply do not know about the process and what measures can be taken to hold people accountable.”
“Justin’s courage will serve to empower other students at universities across the country who will realize that students can help move justice forward when administrations can’t or won’t,” added Roz Rothstein, co-founder and CEO of StandWithUs.
A campus police spokesperson stated that the department would investigate all complaints in the matter. Feldman’s complaint is just the beginning.
As this article is being written, Alyza Lewin, COO of the Louis D. Brandeis Center in Washington, DC, has dispatched its director of legal initiatives Aviva Vogelstein and a law clerk to fly to Los Angeles to meet with numerous other students who are scheduled to file complaints. Law students from the UCLA Brandeis chapter will observe the process.
The police currently are reviewing a list of 10 individuals who allegedly perpetrated the disruption, along with screen captures of their text messages and social media statements. One such message urged disruptors to “shut it down.”
Within 24 hours of Feldman’s complaint, UCLA confirmed that the matter would indeed be referred to prosecutors. “UCPD has reviewed the video of the May 17 disruption and is investigating the information in the incident report for any new evidence about the disruption that it may contain,” stated university spokesman Tamberg. He added, “UCPD will forward the incident report to the Los Angeles City Attorney’s Office.” A prosecutor has already been assigned. Tamberg stated UCPD “will discuss both the report and the video with the prosecuting attorney in July, when that person returns from leave.”
“This case is a turning point for all students across the country,” asserts SWU’s Rothstein. Lewin of the Brandeis Center agreed, stating, “Students across the country now recognize the importance of promptly reporting incidents like these to the police.”